当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

FG 1.2 评估增加土壤有机质的协同效益的经济影响.pdf

上传人: Fl****zo 编号:724402 2025-07-01 17页 8.13MB

1、FG 1.2 Assessing the Economic Impact of the Co-Benefits of Increasing Soil Organic Matter Andrea FerrariniUniversit Cattolica del Sacro CuoreDuring Enrollment of Carbon Farmers.Which is estimated payment for these outcomes?If you apply these practices your estimated carbon removal is.BaselineProject

2、 line TimeCO2 removed6k eur150 Mg CO2 Which is the soil health ROI?Which co-benefits I might obtain from adopting these practices?Operators or groups of operators may report co-benefits that contribute to thesustainability objectives beyond the minimum sustainability requirements.To this end,their r

3、eporting SHOULD COMPLY with the certificationmethodologies tailored to the different carbon removal activities,developedby the Commission.Certification methodologies should,as much as possible,INCENTIVIZE thegeneration of co-benefits for BIODIVERSITY going beyond the minimumsustainability requiremen

4、ts.These additional co-benefits will give more economic value to the certifiedcarbon removals and will result in higher revenues for the operators.Paragraph 17 of the CRCFThe other side of the coin of CarbonfarmingdonerightCO2H2OC credits CO2H2OEvery ton of CO2 removedNPKf()Half a ton of SOM storedN

5、utrientsWhy is this FG of interest?Most of the economic value of SOC sequestration is climate mitigation or we can go beyond by valuing also its agronomic benefits?SOM marginal value (Mg C ha-1y-1)NPKIncreased nutrient cycling as fertilizers replacement valuePAWC as estimated yield improvementBetter

6、 soil structure as reduced fuel consumptionA Blueprint(aka an accounting framework)with which practitioners and stakeholders can understand HOW TO CALCULATE the economic value of agronomical hidden on-farm SOM co-benefitsAbove and/or belowground biodiversity as?Valuing co-benefitsAdapted from Collin

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要探讨了增加土壤有机物质(SOM)共同利益的经济影响评估,特别是对于参与碳农业的农民。关键点如下: 1. SOM的固定可带来经济效益,例如,每吨CO2移除和半吨SOM储存的潜在价值。 2. 认证方法应激励超越最低可持续性要求的生物多样性共同利益的产生。 3. SOM的共同利益包括增加养分循环、改善土壤结构和提高产量等,但这些利益很少被量化。 4. 不同群体(学术界、农业食品业、农民/顾问、碳农业项目开发者)对SOM共同利益的认知、测量和投资回报率(ROI)不同。 5. 长期来看,农民和顾问可能是提高SOM投资回报的游戏规则改变者。 6. 需要一个共享和验证的会计框架来估算与碳农业相关的SOM价值。 核心数据引用: - 每移除150Mg CO2的估计支付为6,000欧元。 - 不同群体对SOM共同利益的ROI感知和测量情况:农民/顾问55%意识到并测量了这些利益,而学术界和碳农业项目开发者分别为18%和100%。 文章强调了量化SOM共同利益的重要性,并提出了未来行动的方向,包括统一术语、报告真实的长期利益、追踪农场经验以及解决私人价值与社会价值的问题。
"土壤有机质提升,收益知多少?" "碳农夫的隐形收益,你了解吗?" "如何衡量土壤碳的附加价值?"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠