当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

探索图可解释性中的分布外泛化问题.pdf

上传人: 2*** 编号:144840 2023-10-28 35页 2.41MB

1、探索图可解释性中的分布外泛化问题方俊峰 中国科学技术大学 博士DataFunSummit#2023当前的可解释评估指标真的“公平”吗?可解释算法为何会引入OOD问题?如何实现网络-数据的联合解释?1)避开公式 2)中英混杂2Background3How to define explainability?(1)Miller,Tim.“Explanation in artificial intelligence:Insights from the social sciences.”arXiv Preprint arXiv:1706.07269.(2017).Explainability is th

2、e degree to which a human can understand the models result 1Find which fractions are most influential to the GNNs predictionFind important subgraphInputModelCycleCycleGridHouseBA3-motifExplanationMethodExisting methodsSAGradCAMGNNExplainerPGExplainerCF-GNNExGraphMaskGSATDIR*GREA*m=0.03m=0.94GemPGMEx

3、6Evaluation metricNIPS 2023 Oral(2%)Evaluating Post-hoc Explanations for Graph Neural Networks via Robustness Analysis.Existing Evaluation metrics1.Human supervision seeks to justify whether the explanations align with human knowledge,but it is often too subjective,thus hardly providing quantifiable

4、 assessments.2.Measuring the agreement between the generated and ground-truth explanations,such as Precision and Recall.Unfortunately,access to the ground truth is usually unavailable and labor-extensive.CycleGridExisting Evaluation metrics#Caveat of RM:as the after-removal subgraphs are likely to l

5、ie off the distribution of full graphs,the GNN is forced to handle these off-manifoldinputs and easily gets erroneous predictions.3.Feature Removal(RM):first remove the unimportant features and feed the remaining part(i.e.,explanatory subgraph)into the GNN,and then observe how the prediction changes

6、.Existing Evaluation metrics4.Generation-based metrics:Instead of directly feeding,they use a generative model to generate a new full graph conditioned on the subgraph.#Caveat of Generation-based metrics:the generation-based metrics show respectto the data distribution somehow but couldbe inconsiste

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文探讨了图神经网络(GNN)的可解释性问题,特别是分布外泛化问题。作者指出,现有的可解释性评估指标可能并不“公平”,因为它们无法量化地评估解释的质量,而且通常无法获取真实的数据分布。作者提出了一种新的评估方法,即对抗性鲁棒性,它通过扰动除解释以外的边来评估解释的质量。此外,作者还提出了一种名为CGE的新方法,它结合了图神经网络的可解释性和学习任务,通过迭代选择子图来优化现有的解释方法。最后,作者提出了一种名为Cooperative GNN Explanation的方法,它通过合作优化现有的解释方法,以提高图神经网络的可解释性。
"图神经网络解释中的分布外泛化问题" "如何评估和改进图神经网络的解释性?" "图神经网络在OOD问题上的挑战与解决方案"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠