当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

弗雷德·海丁与亚历克斯·奥尼尔与拉克伦·普莱斯与埃里克·罗森巴赫_评估国家网络安全战略的框架.pdf

上传人: 张** 编号:175543 2024-09-13 54页 12.59MB

1、#BHUSA BlackHatEventsA Framework For Evaluating NationalCybersecurity StrategiesFred Heiding,Alex ONeill,Lachlan Price,Eric RosenbachResearch Fellow,Harvard_fredrikh01Fred HeidingAlex ONeillIndependent ResearcherLachlan PriceMPP Student and ResearchAssistant,HarvardEric RosenbachLecturer in Public P

2、olicy,HarvardTeam#BHUSA BlackHatEvents#BHUSA BlackHatEventsTeamResearch Fellow,Harvard_fredrikh01I hacked the King ofSwedenFred HeidingAlex ONeillIndependent ResearcherLachlan PriceMPP Student and ResearchAssistant,HarvardEric RosenbachLecturer in Public Policy,HarvardIs this ourfuture?1983Beginning

3、 of the internetCyber strategies are pretty new!20091st UK,Australian cyber strategies2024Today20111st US,German strategies2nd UK strategy20162nd German,Australian strategies3rd UK strategy,UKNCSC formed20182nd USstrategyCISAformed20203rdAustralianstrategy2021Cyberspace solarium commission3rd German

4、 strategy20224th UK strategy20233rd US strategy4th Australian strategyDo we knowwhat weare doing?Do we knowwhat weare doing?What does a good cyber strategy entail?How technical should the strategy be?Who is the audience?Vision statement or practical policy guide?How We Conducted Our Research#BHUSA B

5、lackHatEventsintro-method(how)-what we discovered-conclusionOther evaluation frameworks existNCSI,ITU,MITAbsolute vs relative scoringHow to justify the scores?Can countries be scored in isolation?Related workCreating the Scorecard Government selectionAnalysisStrong cyber capabilities1.Diversity(poli

6、tical,geographic,etc.)2.Published after 20203.Publicly accessible+English4.Evaluation Framework268 criteria over 5 pillarsInterviews25+interviewees(9/23-7/24)Leading cyber experts andpolicymakersEvaluation Framework268 criteria over 5 pillarsInterviews25+interviewees(9/23-7/24)Leading cyber experts

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文概述了一个评估国家网络安全战略的框架,由哈佛大学的Fred Heiding、Alex O’Neill、Lachlan Price和Eric Rosenbach等人共同研究。文章首先提出了一个问题:在大多数国家制定的网络安全战略中,我们是否知道自己在做什么?接着,文章通过分析不同国家的网络安全战略,提出了一个包含268个标准的评估框架,涵盖了五个主要领域:保护人民、机构、和系统、生成能力和能力、建立伙伴关系、沟通明确的政策。研究发现了各国的优势和需要改进的地方,例如美国、英国、德国、日本、新加坡等国的战略都有一定的优势,但在保护弱势群体和设定可衡量的目标方面普遍存在不足。最后,文章提出了几个关键问题,如现代网络安全机构的角色和权力、如何平衡监管、激励和推荐、如何应对网络犯罪的多边合作等,并呼吁各界共同参与国家网络安全建设。
如何保护弱势群体?" 多边合作如何有效?" 角色与权力如何平衡?"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠