当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

罗兰贝格(Roland Berger):企业家在开放式创新之路上的力量(英文版)(12页).pdf

上传人: Me****y 编号:15996 2020-08-01 12页 1.16MB

1、HOW BELGIAN CORPORATIONS COMPARE TO THE FRENCH AND DUTCH ONES IN USING CORPORATE VENTURING The power of entrepreneurs on the road towards open innovation 06.2020 BRUSSELS / BELGIUM 06.2020 BRUSSELS / BELGIUM FAST FACTS (1) structural differences between publicly listed Belgian companies and its larg

2、er French and Dutch counterparts, (2) a different, defensive approach towards new industry challengers, (3) a lack of a clearly defined open innovation strategy. H Part of this disparity can be linked to the different size and corporate structure of CAC40 and AEX25 companies. In 2019, the average ma

3、rket cap of a BEL20 corporation was EUR 15.85bn compared to EUR 32.42bn and EUR 45.81bn1) for companies in the AEX25 and CAC40 respectively. Equally, the median market cap is significantly smaller for BEL20 than for AEX25 and CAC40 companies. Being of larger average size and hence disposing of more

4、substantial resources, French and Dutch corporations are more likely to commit to corporate venturing efforts. Nevertheless, differences in corporate venturing efforts are striking and cannot only be explained by structural discrepancies. In Belgium, many large corporations seem to still have a more

5、 defensive approach towards rising industry challengers. Instead of considering mutually beneficial collaboration models, incumbents largely invest in and acquire We also observe that many corporations have an iterative approach to the dif- ferent corporate venturing models. Often incumbents start c

6、onnecting with start- ups through one-off events to get a first idea of the entrepreneurs potential. Then, they engage more with startups by supporting them in in-house or external incubators and/or later accelerators. Finally, if the startups evolution has been meeting its mentors expectation, the

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要探讨了比利时、法国和荷兰公司在使用企业风险投资(Corporate Venturing)方面的比较。主要观点如下: 1. 企业风险投资对于推动大公司创新变得越来越重要,它包括多种合作模式,如一次性活动、资源共享和商业支持以及不同强度的合作伙伴关系。 2. 相比法国和荷兰,比利时的企业风险投资活动较少,只有45%的BEL20公司参与,而法国为85%,荷兰为72%。原因包括比利时的公司结构差异,以及对新行业挑战者的防御性态度,以及BEL20公司缺乏明确的开放式创新战略。 3. 企业风险投资在不同行业中的使用存在显著差异,这可以解释为客户导向程度和行业进入壁垒,这倾向于选择内部创新和收购而不是企业风险投资。 4. 企业风险投资模式的适当性取决于现有公司追求的具体战略目标,合作的强度以及合作伙伴的成熟度。 5. 建议公司领导者应创建跨部门的创业文化,设计并实施专注于企业创新战略,包括一个专门的企业风险投资单位,并不断教育、跟踪和评估初创企业,通过建立关键绩效指标来衡量成功和捕捉创新潜力。 6. 对于比利时的情况,公司应更多地与初创企业合作,并在更早的成熟阶段进行合作,允许他们指导和共同开发针对特定主题的创新,并教育企业家了解其行业挑战,而不是让创新潜力落入竞争者手中。
比利时企业如何利用企业风险投资? 企业风险投资如何帮助大公司创新? 企业风险投资有哪些不同的合作模式?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠