当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

揭示效率、性能和可持续性之间的权衡:液冷辅助空气冷却与传统空气冷却的案例研究.pdf

上传人: 明**** 编号:1011354 2025-12-21 17页 1.77MB

1、CloudflareLeslye Paniagua and Sharon AlperUnraveling the Efficiency,Performance and Sustainability Trade-Offs:Case study of LAAC vs ACUnraveling the Efficiency,Performance and Sustainability Trade-Offs:Case study of Liquid Assisted Air Cooling vs Traditional Air CoolingLeslye Paniagua and Sharon Alp

2、erDATA CENTER(DC)SUSTAINABILITYThe cooling challenge:Infrastructure readinessPowerGPU Power WCPU Power W2025up to 500 Wup to 750 WTimeLiquid CooledAir CooledChip architecture has reached a point where its very challenging to cool 100%with air.Higher power density is pushing the industry towards Liqu

3、id Cooling faster than ever.BUT As of early 2025,less than 25%of global data centers have adopted some form of liquid cooling technologyCloudflares distributed Network335+citiesin 125+countries190+citieswith GPUsHardware strategy Every service can run in every serverVery similar server design deploy

4、ed globally,many facing different:-Ambient conditions-Power availability(L11&L12)-Data Center infrastructure(readiness for Liquid Cooling)Early exploration of Liquid Cooling has started to ensure we are ready to support the upcoming technologies if/when air cooling becomes a limiting factor.100%air

5、cooledas of 2025Hardware POCCase StudyDirect comparison of Air Cooling vs Liquid Assisted Air CoolingSystem Overview2U1N chassis1x AMD Turin CPU(500W,192c)12x 64GB DDR5-56003x 8TB E1.S1x OCP3.0 2x25G NIC1x DC-SCM 2.05x 8056 DR fansLiquid Assisted Air Cooled(LAAC)Air Cooled(EVAC HEATSINK)Test planRel

6、iabilityQ:Are critical component temperatures significantly lower with LAAC vs AC?M:Monitor telemetry during testT:BMCA:Yes/No PerformanceQ:Does thermal solution impact performance?M:Direct benchmark in-lab testT:cf_benchmarkA:Yes/NoPower EfficiencyQ:Does LAAC provide significant power savings compa

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
根据《Data Center Sustainability: Unraveling the Efficiency, Performance and Sustainability Trade-Offs: Case study of LAAC vs AC》的内容,以下是全文关键点的概括: 1. **冷却挑战**:随着芯片架构的发展,100%使用空气冷却变得越来越困难,而更高的功率密度推动行业加速转向液体冷却。 2. **液体冷却普及率**:截至2025年初,全球数据中心中只有不到25%采用了某种形式的液体冷却技术。 3. **Cloudflare的硬件策略**:Cloudflare在全球范围内部署了相似的硬件设计,并开始探索液体冷却以确保未来技术支持。 4. **测试结果**: - **性能**:液体辅助空气冷却(LAAC)与传统空气冷却(AC)在性能上没有显著差异。 - **功耗效率**:LAAC的功耗略高于AC,但差距很小(1.6%)。 - **可靠性**:LAAC在降低关键组件温度方面表现更好,但某些组件(如DIMM)的温度略有上升。 5. **可持续性影响**:LAAC在材料、制造复杂性和碳排放方面优于AC。 6. **过渡到液体冷却的因素**:包括组件设计、集成功能和机架电源可用性。 7. **结论**:在采用先进的冷却解决方案时,应考虑碳影响,并深入了解支持液体冷却的关键触发因素。
性能提升还是能耗降低?" 液冷技术如何助力可持续发展?" 成本效益与可靠性如何权衡?"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠